While the EV tax credit bonus for union-built EVs has been around for many years, now it is going away, and the reason is obvious – demand is high. While most models give backordered products a tax credit, Manchin wants to redirect the money to a dead hydrogen car. Is this an unfair and immoral move? What impact will the tax credit penalty have on domestic and foreign automakers?
EV tax credit bonus for union-built EVs is gone
Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin opposes the EV tax credit bonus for union-built EVs. The proposal would give an additional $4,500 rebate to EV buyers who buy union-built cars. Although Manchin does not have a vote on the bill, he still has tremendous power over the final form. The bill must also pass an evenly divided Senate.
Despite these concerns, Manchin is confident that he will be able to pass the climate legislation this year. He says he will continue to hear his colleagues’ views on the proposal and will keep talking with his colleagues over the next few days. But the Democrats still can’t afford to lose their last chance at passing something. While he hasn’t specifically stated his priorities, he has indicated that he supports renewable energy tax credits and a plan to build domestic supply chains of renewable energy raw materials.
The new proposal is a victory for EV buyers, especially in unionized areas. It’s a victory for American workers, as the union-built EVs have a significant advantage over non-union-built ones. The tax credit bonus will not only be applied to union-built cars, but also to EVs manufactured by non-union firms.
Cap on EV tax credit bonus unfair to US automakers
The auto industry has been calling for the federal government to remove a cap on the $7,500 EV tax credit bonus. The current cap only allows the manufacturers to receive the bonus once they sell 200,000 electric vehicles, but it has already been reached for Tesla and GM. Now, the automakers are calling for the cap to be removed and a sunset date set for when the EV market reaches a mature state. Ultimately, the goal is to increase sales of EVs to millions of vehicles by 2022, and Congress should act.
Proposals to cap the EV tax credit at $80,000 fail to achieve their stated goals. They fail to address the fact that the MSRP cap is too high. As a result, automakers are more likely to focus on making higher-end luxury vehicles. Moreover, the price of raw materials like cobalt and nickel are soaring, cutting into automakers’ margins. This means that some larger higher-end EVs may have the same CO2 emissions as comparable ICE vehicles.
Impact on foreign automakers
Joe Manchin, the senior United States senator from West Virginia, has come out against the EV tax credit bonus. He has called the credit’s structure “ludicrous” and argued that hydrogen autos should be given incentives in addition to the credit. Manchin is also pushing for stricter limits on the types of autos that qualify for the credit and on how much money the owners of those cars can earn.
The EV tax credit bonus has been controversial for a few reasons. While it may sound like a good thing, it’s not really good for EVs. It’s hard to see how a tax credit bonus could be beneficial for a dying technology. It’s also nonrefundable and only applies to electric vehicles that cost less than $50,000. Manchin argues that the program has not been implemented fairly, and the benefit to manufacturers isn’t enough.
Impact on domestic automakers
U.S. Senator Joe Manchin has criticized the EV tax credit bonus as “ridiculous” and has called for stricter income requirements and limits. He has called for a switch to hydrogen vehicles and has also criticized the bonus as unfair. However, there is an alternative to eliminating the EV tax credit bonus that may be more beneficial for consumers. Here are the benefits of an EV.
The $4,500 incentive for electric vehicles made by unions was part of the “Build Back Better” initiative, but the proposal was opposed by several Democrat senators. Even though the incentive would have been helpful for consumers, the push for a union-friendly credit was opposed by companies that don’t have a factory in the United States. These companies argued that it would create an artificial benefit and force unionizing in their factories.
- GM Pushing 7 New EPA Standards That Could Move US Toward Mass EV Adoption - September 25, 2022
- Tesla Shows How to Keep Prices Low on Electric-Car Charger Installation Costs - September 21, 2022
- BMW Shows Off New Electric Racer - September 20, 2022